如果你有甚麼很明顯的缺陷，最好不要等到對方提了才來解釋。 這些對方可能

如果你有甚麼很明顯的缺陷，最好不要等到對方提了才來解釋。 這些對方可能質疑的點，你若先解釋有可能更容易的讓對方釋懷，覺得你光明正大，而且你也可以把狀況說明到一個正面且合理的方向。可是若你自己沒先提這履歷缺陷，對方問了你才回答，反而就沒加分的效果了。 甚至若回答不好，面試官還覺得你很可疑。 結果整場面試都在詢問你的缺陷，正事反而沒談清楚

結果 (英文) 1:

If you have any obvious flaws, it is best not to wait until the other party to mention only be explained. The other side may question the point, if you have to explain it may be easier to let go of the other side, you feel honest, and you can explain the situation to a positive and reasonable direction. But if you did not mention this first record defects, the other asked you before answering, but there is no effect of adding the points. Even if the answer is not good, the interviewer also think you're suspicious. The entire interview results are asking your flaws, but did not talk down to business clear

結果 (英文) 2:

對於壟斷者來說，創新用新利潤取代現有利潤，淨收益較小。這稱為替換效果。

結果 (英文) 3:

If you have any obvious defects, it's better not to wait for the other party to explain them. If you explain these questions first, it may be easier for the other party to let go and feel that you are aboveboard, and you can also explain the situation to a positive and reasonable direction. However, if you didn't mention the defect first, the other party asked you to answer, but it didn't have the effect of adding points. Even if you don't answer well, the interviewer thinks you're suspicious. As a result, the whole interview is asking about your defects, but the business is not clear