Like you hungry when you in front of a bread, you still think this bread is who took it would not constitute a crime or it? Then the significance of copyright protection law for the poor countries is the same .
If you are hungry, your presence is a steamed bread, you will think of who is the steamed bread, or take it would constitute a crime? Then copyright protection method for poor countries the meaning is the same.
It's like when you're hungry, before you have a steamed bun, who you would have thought the bread was, or whether it would constitute a crime? then the Copyright Protection Act implications for poor countries would be the same.