你好！下记2封邮件总结为三点疑问，我来一一答复贵司：1）9个点应该无内

你好！

下记2封邮件总结为三点疑问，我来一一答复贵司：

1）9个点应该无内部壁的遮挡，但是数值看大都低于4.5。
这个如我司和贵司之前一直沟通的，因为试验素材为原B1样件剩余件，相比较模具件，快速成型件素材按键整体亮度不好调控控且亮度不均、颜色偏暗。因此此处试验如试验前我司所反馈的只为证明亮度差异。而不能作为后续量产件光亮度的参考。量产件我司会调整开关亮度一致，且目标值MAX4.5cd/m2。

2）内壁中和内壁外的光度差异小，是内壁的效果不够显著吗？
这个是因为我司试验设备测试光强时测试定点是没有没有坐标的，指定的测试点是凭视觉手动移位取点的。所以不排除有取点过于靠近内壁而导致光度差异小的原因。另外，我司多次试验发现每次做此项试验取值都不太一致，如我所提供光强报告的中间点，首次提交亮度为6.47，第二次追加9个点时也取了中间点同时试验，但试验结果为亮度5.6。所以得出初步结论为这个试验光亮不可控。。因为测试亮度只为一个点，而不像我们开关字符为区域面光强测试。所得结论只能作为亮度差异的参考。

3）刻印中心和内壁中的光度差异大
中心和内壁中的光度差异大是肯定的。但是我们前提要了解到，如我上述第2点所说，因为测试的只为一个点，所以才会有这么大的差异，如果为区域面光强分析的话差异不会这么大。具体差异多大要根据贵司提供最新（大小2种）字符据后我司做了试验才能给出肯定的答复。

以上请知悉，谢谢！

結果 (英文) 1:

你好！下记2封邮件总结为三点疑问，我来一一答复贵司：1）9个点应该无内部壁的遮挡，但是数值看大都低于4.5。这个如我司和贵司之前一直沟通的，因为试验素材为原B1样件剩余件，相比较模具件，快速成型件素材按键整体亮度不好调控控且亮度不均、颜色偏暗。因此此处试验如试验前我司所反馈的只为证明亮度差异。而不能作为后续量产件光亮度的参考。量产件我司会调整开关亮度一致，且目标值MAX4.5cd/m2。2）内壁中和内壁外的光度差异小，是内壁的效果不够显著吗？这个是因为我司试验设备测试光强时测试定点是没有没有坐标的，指定的测试点是凭视觉手动移位取点的。所以不排除有取点过于靠近内壁而导致光度差异小的原因。另外，我司多次试验发现每次做此项试验取值都不太一致，如我所提供光强报告的中间点，首次提交亮度为6.47，第二次追加9个点时也取了中间点同时试验，但试验结果为亮度5.6。所以得出初步结论为这个试验光亮不可控。。因为测试亮度只为一个点，而不像我们开关字符为区域面光强测试。所得结论只能作为亮度差异的参考。3）刻印中心和内壁中的光度差异大Brightness difference in the Center and the inner wall is for sure. Premise but we must understand that, as I said above the 2nd, because testing for only one point, why is there such a big difference, if for the regional analysis of surface intensity differences not so much. Specific differences in accordance with your latest perhaps (size 2) characters according to Division I after doing the test to give a definite answer.Please note that above, thank you!

結果 (英文) 3:

Hello

note 2 email summary for the three questions, I will reply your company:

1) 9 points should be no internal wall block, but numerical point of view, mostly below 4.5.
this as our and your company before has been communication, as test material for original B1 sample remaining pieces, compared to the mold piece, overall brightness of the rapid prototyping material key bad is controlled and uneven brightness, color darker. So we have to test the difference of the brightness of the division before the test. And can not be used as a reference for the light intensity of the subsequent production parts. The production part of the Division I will adjust the brightness of the switch, and the target value of MAX4.5cd/m2.

2) the difference between the inner wall and the inner wall is small, and the effect of the inner wall is not obvious enough. This is because the test intensity of the test equipment of the test point is no coordinate, the specified test point is based on the visual manual shift point. So do not rule out the point is too close to the inner wall and cause a small difference in the light of the reason. In addition, the division multiple test found that the value of each test is not consistent, such as the middle point of the intensity of the report, the first time to submit the brightness of second, 6.47 times the additional 9 points were taken at the same time, but the test results for the brightness of 5.6.So the preliminary conclusion is that the light of this experiment is not controllable.. Because the test brightness is only one point, not the character of the switch is the area of the intensity test. The conclusion can only be used as a reference for the difference of brightness.

3) the luminosity difference between the luminosity difference between center and engraved in the inner wall and the inner wall of the large
center is sure. But we must understand that, as I said above second points, because the test is only a point, so there will be such a big difference, if the intensity of the region is not so big.Specific differences in according to your company to provide the latest (size 2) character according to our do test in order to give certainly reply.

more than you know, thank you!