附近陳姓民眾表示，2011年市府曾徵詢地主意願，希望納入古蹟保護，但多

附近陳姓民眾表示，2011年市府曾徵詢地主意願，希望納入古蹟保護，但多數地主反對，因此暫時擱置，懷疑地主是為了不想被列為古蹟，疏於照顧。有網友在網路上猛po探險照，表示聚奎居內部多處外牆剝落且無人看管，多處天花板崩落，相當危險；還有人表示有靈異傳說，吸引更多年輕人揪團探險。聚奎居後人則透過文化局表示，「歡迎參觀，但受傷概不負責。」

結果 (英文) 1:

Near the displayed surname Jin renqing said 詢 idea 願 2011 municipal levy, want to Varna in ancient miracle o, but number landlords against Yes, 暫 time GE reset, a suspicion is why not is because the landlord sign, neglect as upon being hired. NET friends in the net the way Meng Po Exploration photos, said ju Kui internal finish walls a: falls and can't minders finish ceiling caved, quite dangerous; still expressed a spiritual different Legends, attract more young people find 團 Exploration. Ju Kui who after entering into over the Bureau, "said Huan Ying participant views, but the heel nothing in 負 Ze. 」

結果 (英文) 2:

People close to Chen said that in 2011 the city had sought the landlord wishes, want to include the protection of monuments, but most landlords against it in abeyance, the landlord is in order not to be suspected as a monument neglect. There are users on the web fierce po adventure photos, showing Jukui UN internal multiple facades peeling and unattended, multiple ceiling caving, very dangerous; also expressed supernatural legends, attract more young people pulling group adventure. Habitat Jukui posterity through the Cultural Affairs Bureau said, "welcome to visit, but is not responsible for injuries."

結果 (英文) 3:

Near people surnamed said 2011 city has consulted the landlord wishes, hope into the protection of monuments, but most against the landowner, therefore temporarily shelved, doubt the landlord is to is listed as a monument, negligent care. Netizens on the Internet Meng Po exploration according to that Jukui Ju internal multiple wall spalling and unattended, multiple ceiling caving, very dangerous; others said has a supernatural legends, to attract more young people pulling group exploration. In later generations through the Jukui Culture Bureau said, "welcome to visit, but the injury is not responsible. "