These priors have been studied extensively and have been shown to have a number of good theoretical properties.<br>For example, Armagan et al. [1] gave sufficient conditions for posterior consistency in univariate linear regression<br>when several well-known shrinkage priors are placed on the coefficients. Ghosh and Chakrabarti [21], van der Pas et al.<br>[41], and van der Pas et al. [42] showed that when these priors are used to estimate sparse normal means, the posterior<br>distributions concentrate around the true means at the minimax rate under mild conditions. van der Pas et al. [44] also<br>obtained minimax-optimal posterior contraction rates for the horseshoe under both empirical Bayes and hierarchical<br>Bayesian choices for the global shrinkage parameter τ in (2). For the normal means model, the theoretical properties<br>of model selection (including the variable selection method applied in this article) and uncertainty quantification<br>under scale-mixture priors were also recently investigated by Salomond [36] and van der Pas et al. [43]. Finally, in<br>the context of multiple hypothesis testing, Bhadra et al. [6], Datta and Ghosh [16], Ghosh and Chakrabarti [21], and<br>Ghosh et al. [22] showed that multiple testing rules induced by these shrinkage priors can achieve optimal Bayes risk<br>in terms of 0-1 symmetric loss (or expected number of misclassified signals).<br>Ghosh et al. [22] observed that for a large number of global-local shrinkage priors of the form (2), the local<br>parameter ξi has a hyperprior distribution π(ξi) that can be written as<br>π(ξi) = Kξ<br>−a−1<br>i L(ξi), (3)<br>where K > 0 is the constant of proportionality, a is positive real number, and L is a positive measurable, non-constant,<br>slowly varying function over (0, ∞).
正在翻譯中..
